Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/4302
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZainal Abidin N.A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRamlee M.H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAb Rashid A.M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNg B.W.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGan S.H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAbdul Kadir M.R.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-15T02:47:33Z-
dc.date.available2023-01-15T02:47:33Z-
dc.date.issued2022-07-
dc.identifier.issn00201383-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/4302-
dc.descriptionWeb of Science / Scopusen_US
dc.description.abstractFor anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R), one of the crucial aspects of treatment is the fixator selection that could provide initial graft fixation post-operatively. Literature on biomechanical stabilities of different sizes of fixators as femoral graft fixation is limited. Therefore, this study aims to analyse the influence of different diameters of cross-pins on the stability of graft fixations after ACL-R via finite element analysis (FEA). In the methodology, three-dimensional (3D) models of three different diameters of cross-pins were developed, of which anterior tibial loads (ATL) were applied onto the tibia. From the findings, the cross-pin with a smaller diameter (4 mm) provided optimum stability than larger diameter cross-pins, whereby it demonstrated acceptable stresses at the fixators (both cross-pin and interference screw) with a different percentage of 28%, while the stresses at the corresponding bones were favourable for osseointegration to occur. Besides, the strains of the knee joint with 4 mm diameter cross-pin were also superior in providing a good biomechanical environment for bone healing, while the recorded strain values at fixators were comparable with a larger diameter of cross-pins without being inferior in terms of deformation. To conclude, the cross-pin with 4 mm diameter depicted the best biomechanical aspects in graft fixation for ACL-R since it allows better assistance for the osseointegration process and can minimise the possibility of the breakage and migration of fixators. This study is not only useful for medical surgeons to justify their choices of pin diameter to treat patients, but also for researchers to conduct future studies.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofInjuryen_US
dc.subjectACL-Ren_US
dc.subjectBiomechanicsen_US
dc.subjectDiameter of fixatoren_US
dc.subjectFEAen_US
dc.subjectStabilityen_US
dc.subjectStress-strainen_US
dc.titleBiomechanical effects of cross-pin's diameter in reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament – A specific case study via finite element analysisen_US
dc.typeInternationalen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.injury.2022.05.021-
dc.description.page2424 - 2436en_US
dc.volume53 (7)en_US
dc.description.typeArticleen_US
dc.description.impactfactor2.687en_US
dc.description.quartileQ2en_US
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypeInternational-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Data Science and Computing - Journal (Scopus/WOS)
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.