Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/4605
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDada, James Temitopeen_US
dc.contributor.authorAjide, Folorunsho Monsuren_US
dc.contributor.authorArnaut, Marinaen_US
dc.contributor.authorAdams A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-10T07:20:37Z-
dc.date.available2023-04-10T07:20:37Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.issn13504509-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/4605-
dc.descriptionWeb of Science / Scopusen_US
dc.description.abstractRecent studies suggest that shadow economy has several implications for environmental sustainability. However, the relevance of financial development in the nexus between shadow economy-environmental sustainability remains an open question. This study examines the role of shadow economy and financial development in addition to economic growth, trade openness, and urbanization on the environmental sustainability of a panel of 30 African countries from 1991 to 2017. Specifically, the study investigates the effect of these variables on African countries’ ecological footprint and bio-capacity. Findings based on the augmented mean group estimator reveal that shadow economy, financial development, economic growth, and urbanization intensify ecological footprint, while trade openness reduces it. Further investigations reveal that shadow economy, economic growth, and urbanization reduce bio-capacity while trade openness increases it. The interactive term of the shadow economy and financial development shows that a strong financial system significantly moderates the adverse impact of shadow economy on environmental degradation. These results persist when common correlated effect mean group is used to re-estimate the models. Furthermore, Dumitrescu and Hurlin’s non-causality tests show two-way causality between ecological footprint and shadow economy, bio-capacity and shadow economy, and financial development. Nevertheless, unidirectional causality is found from financial development to ecological footprint and shadow economy, economic growth to ecological footprint, biocapacity, and financial development. Lastly, the policy implications of the results are discussed in line with these economies.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor and Francis Ltd.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecologyen_US
dc.subjectShadow economyen_US
dc.subjectFinancial developmenten_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental sustainabilityen_US
dc.subjectAfricaen_US
dc.titleOn the Shadow Economy-Environmental Sustainability Nexus in Africa: the (Ir) relevance of Financial Developmenten_US
dc.typeInternationalen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/13504509.2022.2115576-
dc.description.page6-20en_US
dc.description.researchareaEconomicen_US
dc.description.researchareaSustainabilityen_US
dc.description.researchareaFinancial developmenten_US
dc.volume30(1)en_US
dc.description.typeArticleen_US
dc.description.impactfactor4.87en_US
dc.description.quartileQ1en_US
dc.contributor.correspondingauthoradams.a@umk.edu.myen_US
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypeInternational-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptUniversiti Malaysia Kelantan-
Appears in Collections:Malaysia Graduate School of Entrepreneurship and Business - Journal (Scopus/WOS)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
On shadow ec. - Print.pdfOff prints of article1.96 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.