Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/587
Title: A Comparative Analysis between Shariah Audit and Shariah Review in Islamic Banks in Malaysia: Practitioners' Perspective
Authors: Yasoa', M.R. 
Abdullah, W.A.W. 
Endut, W.A. 
Keywords: Shariah audit.;Shariah review.;Islamic banks.;qualitative method
Issue Date: Jul-2020
Publisher: E-IPH LTD UK
Journal: ENVIRONMENT-BEHAVIOUR PROCEEDINGS JOURNAL 
Conference: AMERABRA International Virtual Conference on Environment-Behavioural Studies 1st Series (AIVCE-BS-1) 
Abstract: 
This paper compares Shariah audit and Shariah review in Islamic banks in Malaysia based on reporting structure, independence, the scope of duties, technology used, guideline and methodology, coverage period, and officers' qualification. The study employs a qualitative method by utilizing semi-structured interviews with nine (9) key industry players. Data gathered from a series of interviews have been transcripted and analyzed using Atlas.ti. This study uncovers that Shariah review and Shariah audit have apparent differences and play their roles as a second and third line of defense, respectively, that eventually could provide a stimulus to Shariah governance and strengthen market confidence.
Description: 
Web of Science
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/587
ISSN: 2398-4287
DOI: 10.21834/ebpj.v5i14.2208
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Entrepreneurship and Business - Proceedings

Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.